<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Washington Square Park: Summer fun</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mikekobal.com/washington-square-park-summer-fun/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mikekobal.com/washington-square-park-summer-fun/</link>
	<description>PHOTOGRAPHY</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 May 2017 00:27:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike.kobal</title>
		<link>http://www.mikekobal.com/washington-square-park-summer-fun/comment-page-1/#comment-11964</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mike.kobal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 16:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikekobal.com/?p=8525#comment-11964</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[it comes down to personal preference. both make great street cameras, if you need low light performance, the X100s wins, if you like the option to change focal length and shoot mostly in daylight, the RX100II works great.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it comes down to personal preference. both make great street cameras, if you need low light performance, the X100s wins, if you like the option to change focal length and shoot mostly in daylight, the RX100II works great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robert</title>
		<link>http://www.mikekobal.com/washington-square-park-summer-fun/comment-page-1/#comment-11963</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[robert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 10:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikekobal.com/?p=8525#comment-11963</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve been debating between the sony rx100ii vs the fujifilm x100s... In weighing the pros vs cons, the sony rx100ii seems to win. What makes fujifilm x100s more better camera when it comes to street photography?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been debating between the sony rx100ii vs the fujifilm x100s&#8230; In weighing the pros vs cons, the sony rx100ii seems to win. What makes fujifilm x100s more better camera when it comes to street photography?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike.kobal</title>
		<link>http://www.mikekobal.com/washington-square-park-summer-fun/comment-page-1/#comment-9878</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mike.kobal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2013 02:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikekobal.com/?p=8525#comment-9878</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[shame on you, Kim! just kidding. for jpegs, definitely go with the X100s then-they look absolutely gorgeous.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>shame on you, Kim! just kidding. for jpegs, definitely go with the X100s then-they look absolutely gorgeous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim</title>
		<link>http://www.mikekobal.com/washington-square-park-summer-fun/comment-page-1/#comment-9877</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2013 02:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikekobal.com/?p=8525#comment-9877</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hate to keep bugging you but between the Fuji x100s and Richo GR for shooting JPEG files then which will give the best quality.  The key word here is jpeg.  To my shame I shoot with the lowest possible jpeg that is why I like a camera that gives a good output in spite of the low jpeg setting.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate to keep bugging you but between the Fuji x100s and Richo GR for shooting JPEG files then which will give the best quality.  The key word here is jpeg.  To my shame I shoot with the lowest possible jpeg that is why I like a camera that gives a good output in spite of the low jpeg setting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike.kobal</title>
		<link>http://www.mikekobal.com/washington-square-park-summer-fun/comment-page-1/#comment-9876</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mike.kobal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2013 23:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikekobal.com/?p=8525#comment-9876</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[depends. fuji&#039;s produce excellent jpegs. the best of all cameras available to date. raw comes in handy if you have to make serious exposure adjustments and need to tweak contrasts, color etc.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>depends. fuji&#8217;s produce excellent jpegs. the best of all cameras available to date. raw comes in handy if you have to make serious exposure adjustments and need to tweak contrasts, color etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim</title>
		<link>http://www.mikekobal.com/washington-square-park-summer-fun/comment-page-1/#comment-9875</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2013 21:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikekobal.com/?p=8525#comment-9875</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is shooting in RAW really that important?  I shot an image in raw and it looked no differently than when I create a jpeg.  The only difference I saw was that the RAW file was larger.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is shooting in RAW really that important?  I shot an image in raw and it looked no differently than when I create a jpeg.  The only difference I saw was that the RAW file was larger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike.kobal</title>
		<link>http://www.mikekobal.com/washington-square-park-summer-fun/comment-page-1/#comment-9386</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mike.kobal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2013 10:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikekobal.com/?p=8525#comment-9386</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[thanks Soied! yes, I always shoot raw, monochrome conversion in LR with slight tint.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks Soied! yes, I always shoot raw, monochrome conversion in LR with slight tint.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Soied</title>
		<link>http://www.mikekobal.com/washington-square-park-summer-fun/comment-page-1/#comment-9381</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Soied]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2013 06:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikekobal.com/?p=8525#comment-9381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cool monochrome photos!
I also have GR, X100 and Rx100 but could never get these wonderful results.
I especially like DR and fade tone of shadow and hightlight.
Excuse me, I wonder how to edit it. You used LR or ACR after shooting by raw? Pls let me know.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool monochrome photos!<br />
I also have GR, X100 and Rx100 but could never get these wonderful results.<br />
I especially like DR and fade tone of shadow and hightlight.<br />
Excuse me, I wonder how to edit it. You used LR or ACR after shooting by raw? Pls let me know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
