<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mike Kobal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mikekobal.com/tag/default/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mikekobal.com</link>
	<description>PHOTOGRAPHY</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 May 2017 19:56:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Review: Part I: ISO comparison: Ricoh GR vs Nikon Coolpix A vs Fuji X100s</title>
		<link>http://www.mikekobal.com/review-part-i-iso-comparison-ricoh-gr-vs-nikon-coolpix-a-vs-fuji-x100s/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mikekobal.com/review-part-i-iso-comparison-ricoh-gr-vs-nikon-coolpix-a-vs-fuji-x100s/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 14:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mike.kobal]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gear Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[default]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fujifilm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high ISO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ooc jpegs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ricoh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[settings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikekobal.com/?p=8267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Ricoh GR 1/2000, f4, ISO 6400 ooc jpeg at default settings First update on the rolling review, ooc jpegs, at default settings. Shot from a tripod in daylight on a cloudy day at f2.8 until I ran out of shutter speeds. I noticed the raw files from the Coolpix A&#8230; </p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.mikekobal.com/review-part-i-iso-comparison-ricoh-gr-vs-nikon-coolpix-a-vs-fuji-x100s/">Review: Part I: ISO comparison: Ricoh GR vs Nikon Coolpix A vs Fuji X100s</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.mikekobal.com">Mike Kobal</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mikekobal.com/review-part-i-iso-comparison-ricoh-gr-vs-nikon-coolpix-a-vs-fuji-x100s/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
