<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RUSH HOUR: fashion editorial shot with the 135mm F2 and Nikon D800E</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mikekobal.com/rush-hour-fashion-editorial-shot-with-the-135mm-f2-and-nikon-d800e/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mikekobal.com/rush-hour-fashion-editorial-shot-with-the-135mm-f2-and-nikon-d800e/</link>
	<description>PHOTOGRAPHY</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 May 2017 00:27:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike.kobal</title>
		<link>http://www.mikekobal.com/rush-hour-fashion-editorial-shot-with-the-135mm-f2-and-nikon-d800e/comment-page-1/#comment-8093</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mike.kobal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 22:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikekobal.com/?p=8058#comment-8093</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you, Derek, totally agree, the AFS70-200mm is excellent optically and a truly versatile lens. And as soon as you stop down to 5.6 or 8 the Zeiss advantage, despite the slightly higher resolution, wont be obvious in most photos. What separates all those 135mm lenses from the 70-200 is that one magic f stop, shooting wide open truly produces stunning bokeh, a 70-200 can get close but side by side, the 135mm at 2.0 has that WOW factor built in. Of course shooting anything live at 2.0 with manual focus will be a very frustrating experience.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Derek, totally agree, the AFS70-200mm is excellent optically and a truly versatile lens. And as soon as you stop down to 5.6 or 8 the Zeiss advantage, despite the slightly higher resolution, wont be obvious in most photos. What separates all those 135mm lenses from the 70-200 is that one magic f stop, shooting wide open truly produces stunning bokeh, a 70-200 can get close but side by side, the 135mm at 2.0 has that WOW factor built in. Of course shooting anything live at 2.0 with manual focus will be a very frustrating experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: derek</title>
		<link>http://www.mikekobal.com/rush-hour-fashion-editorial-shot-with-the-135mm-f2-and-nikon-d800e/comment-page-1/#comment-8091</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[derek]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 22:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikekobal.com/?p=8058#comment-8091</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hi Mike , appreciate your hands-on preview on that interesting lens.
I think the Sony Zeiss 135mmf1.8 is still better than this new expensive MF only 135mm ZF2 lens.
and I agree regardless of its optical quality it is really not practical to shoot MF-only 135mm.
in addition to that, this Zeiss 135mmf2ZF2 is too heavy to as a prime, if I want to carry something like this or the Zeiss1.4/35mmZF2, then I just simply use my AFS70-200f2.8GEDVRii zoom,which is optically not far worse than the best prime in its range, with much more usable range + VR.
But your samples are amazing and I think this Zeiss 135mm f2ZF2 is optically quite promising for any one shoot in a studio or landscape type of things.

as always thank you for your time and effort.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi Mike , appreciate your hands-on preview on that interesting lens.<br />
I think the Sony Zeiss 135mmf1.8 is still better than this new expensive MF only 135mm ZF2 lens.<br />
and I agree regardless of its optical quality it is really not practical to shoot MF-only 135mm.<br />
in addition to that, this Zeiss 135mmf2ZF2 is too heavy to as a prime, if I want to carry something like this or the Zeiss1.4/35mmZF2, then I just simply use my AFS70-200f2.8GEDVRii zoom,which is optically not far worse than the best prime in its range, with much more usable range + VR.<br />
But your samples are amazing and I think this Zeiss 135mm f2ZF2 is optically quite promising for any one shoot in a studio or landscape type of things.</p>
<p>as always thank you for your time and effort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike.kobal</title>
		<link>http://www.mikekobal.com/rush-hour-fashion-editorial-shot-with-the-135mm-f2-and-nikon-d800e/comment-page-1/#comment-8088</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mike.kobal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 22:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikekobal.com/?p=8058#comment-8088</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[the Zeiss 135/1.8A is an awesome lens! I am sure the Nikkor is a different design because of its defocus control feature]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the Zeiss 135/1.8A is an awesome lens! I am sure the Nikkor is a different design because of its defocus control feature</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike.kobal</title>
		<link>http://www.mikekobal.com/rush-hour-fashion-editorial-shot-with-the-135mm-f2-and-nikon-d800e/comment-page-1/#comment-8087</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mike.kobal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 22:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikekobal.com/?p=8058#comment-8087</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[yup, it will fit right in :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yup, it will fit right in <img src="http://www.mikekobal.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris K.</title>
		<link>http://www.mikekobal.com/rush-hour-fashion-editorial-shot-with-the-135mm-f2-and-nikon-d800e/comment-page-1/#comment-8086</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris K.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 21:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikekobal.com/?p=8058#comment-8086</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(oh and forgot to mention, my use case is concert photography and wildlife photography. Given I often use 35mm f/0.95 for concerts and 400mm at f/5.6, I&#039;m guessing I&#039;ll have similar experiences with shallow DoF on this lens...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(oh and forgot to mention, my use case is concert photography and wildlife photography. Given I often use 35mm f/0.95 for concerts and 400mm at f/5.6, I&#8217;m guessing I&#8217;ll have similar experiences with shallow DoF on this lens&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris K.</title>
		<link>http://www.mikekobal.com/rush-hour-fashion-editorial-shot-with-the-135mm-f2-and-nikon-d800e/comment-page-1/#comment-8085</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris K.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 21:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikekobal.com/?p=8058#comment-8085</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looking forward to my Zeiss 135/1.8 A-mount; here&#039;s hoping Sony takes the 36MPix sensor from the 800E and puts it in an Alpha body...someday. (I&#039;m sure Nikon has an exclusivity period.) Surprised the Nikon mount 135 tops out at f/2 (not like that&#039;s a big difference.) Did they decrease max aperture to control vignetting or is it a different optical design?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking forward to my Zeiss 135/1.8 A-mount; here&#8217;s hoping Sony takes the 36MPix sensor from the 800E and puts it in an Alpha body&#8230;someday. (I&#8217;m sure Nikon has an exclusivity period.) Surprised the Nikon mount 135 tops out at f/2 (not like that&#8217;s a big difference.) Did they decrease max aperture to control vignetting or is it a different optical design?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
