<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: JOHNNIE BEHIRI shoots his first documentary with the Sony RX10</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mikekobal.com/johnnie-behiri-shots-his-first-documentary-with-the-sony-rx10/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mikekobal.com/johnnie-behiri-shots-his-first-documentary-with-the-sony-rx10/</link>
	<description>PHOTOGRAPHY</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 May 2017 00:27:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnnie</title>
		<link>http://www.mikekobal.com/johnnie-behiri-shots-his-first-documentary-with-the-sony-rx10/comment-page-1/#comment-10555</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Johnnie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2013 09:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikekobal.com/?p=9636#comment-10555</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mike my dear friend, thanks for posting the video in your blog. Appreciated!.

The RX10 is great if you align expectations... I might add a small video where aliasing/mushy surface (hair for example) and micro blocking is very evident.  

My advice to any one who is considering this camera (or any other camera) for his pleasure/work, TRY before you buy!. 
We all look at moving pictures differently. So your individual experience will serve you best. 

Mike, thank you again!

Johnnie]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike my dear friend, thanks for posting the video in your blog. Appreciated!.</p>
<p>The RX10 is great if you align expectations&#8230; I might add a small video where aliasing/mushy surface (hair for example) and micro blocking is very evident.  </p>
<p>My advice to any one who is considering this camera (or any other camera) for his pleasure/work, TRY before you buy!.<br />
We all look at moving pictures differently. So your individual experience will serve you best. </p>
<p>Mike, thank you again!</p>
<p>Johnnie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Krist</title>
		<link>http://www.mikekobal.com/johnnie-behiri-shots-his-first-documentary-with-the-sony-rx10/comment-page-1/#comment-10553</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Krist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Nov 2013 22:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikekobal.com/?p=9636#comment-10553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mike: I&#039;m keeping my fingers crossed…I remember Johnnie really hated the NEX 6 for video and I don&#039;t think it&#039;s that bad at all (not that I have his video credentials, but outside of the occasional, really ugly moire that can pop up, I thought the quality wasn&#039;t too bad for what I needed). 

I&#039;m most curious about how the RX 10 handles low light. I shot a fireworks demo for a friend last summer with the NEX 6 and the RX 100, and boy, there was a noticeable difference in quality in that kind of light (the NEX 6 was much better and less noisy).

We&#039;ll see!  Thanks, Mike. cheers, Bob]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike: I&#8217;m keeping my fingers crossed…I remember Johnnie really hated the NEX 6 for video and I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s that bad at all (not that I have his video credentials, but outside of the occasional, really ugly moire that can pop up, I thought the quality wasn&#8217;t too bad for what I needed). </p>
<p>I&#8217;m most curious about how the RX 10 handles low light. I shot a fireworks demo for a friend last summer with the NEX 6 and the RX 100, and boy, there was a noticeable difference in quality in that kind of light (the NEX 6 was much better and less noisy).</p>
<p>We&#8217;ll see!  Thanks, Mike. cheers, Bob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike.kobal</title>
		<link>http://www.mikekobal.com/johnnie-behiri-shots-his-first-documentary-with-the-sony-rx10/comment-page-1/#comment-10552</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mike.kobal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Nov 2013 22:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikekobal.com/?p=9636#comment-10552</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Bob, agreed. I think Johnnie was just as excited about this camera as many of us were after reading the specs. He went out and shot a documentary and wasn&#039;t too impressed with it, this of course is exactly how one should test a camera, shoot what you intend to shoot and draw your conclusions. The data we get from shooting a test scene like Andrew did is also very helpful. We learn about dynamic range, moire, high ISO performance etc. Johnnie&#039;s evaluation is a good example that a great spec sheet doesn&#039;t automatically mean you get a great working tool. Still waiting for mine......]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Bob, agreed. I think Johnnie was just as excited about this camera as many of us were after reading the specs. He went out and shot a documentary and wasn&#8217;t too impressed with it, this of course is exactly how one should test a camera, shoot what you intend to shoot and draw your conclusions. The data we get from shooting a test scene like Andrew did is also very helpful. We learn about dynamic range, moire, high ISO performance etc. Johnnie&#8217;s evaluation is a good example that a great spec sheet doesn&#8217;t automatically mean you get a great working tool. Still waiting for mine&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Krist</title>
		<link>http://www.mikekobal.com/johnnie-behiri-shots-his-first-documentary-with-the-sony-rx10/comment-page-1/#comment-10551</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Krist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Nov 2013 22:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikekobal.com/?p=9636#comment-10551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mike: I&#039;m a long time follower and admirer of Johnnie, but he did not seem overly impressed (on the other hand, he is across-the-board tough on DLSR type cameras, especially any appearance of moire). However, I thought his piece looked great (proving, perhaps, that it&#039;s the photographer, er, videographer, and not the camera?) 

On the other hand, Andrew Reid over at EOSHD.com seemed really impressed….I&#039;d be really curious to get your opinion to help me get more perspective on this camera. These guys, both of whom I admire, seem to be at opposite ends of the spectrum on the quality and usefulness of the RX 10.  Thanks! Bob]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike: I&#8217;m a long time follower and admirer of Johnnie, but he did not seem overly impressed (on the other hand, he is across-the-board tough on DLSR type cameras, especially any appearance of moire). However, I thought his piece looked great (proving, perhaps, that it&#8217;s the photographer, er, videographer, and not the camera?) </p>
<p>On the other hand, Andrew Reid over at EOSHD.com seemed really impressed….I&#8217;d be really curious to get your opinion to help me get more perspective on this camera. These guys, both of whom I admire, seem to be at opposite ends of the spectrum on the quality and usefulness of the RX 10.  Thanks! Bob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
