In terms of these Russian lenses, I think I will go with the Helios 42-2 58mm f2, since it’s so cheap (~$30+shipping) rather than the modern and much more expensive 40-2. I can still use it to get that unusual “swirling” bokeh and to achieve that painterly effect when taking pictures of flowers and foliage. I appreciate you sharing your experience in using the others, and I may consider one of the Jupiters in the future.

I’m continuing to work on developing a solid portfolio, but I only have a couple lenses. I like this Takumar 135 you recommend and found one on ebay from Japan for $190 in near mint condition. I’ll go ahead with that if you think it’s a reasonable asking price. I’m also considering a Zuiko 90 f2 macro for portraits…definitely not as affordable, but want something to bring out more skin texture and when photographing for instance jewelry or for detailed makeup shots. If a model has more blemishes, I think the Takumar 135 would give a softer, more appropriate look without having to correct later. How often do you use macros during shoots if at all?

I’m still practicing and learning, but my plan is to eventually work as an assistant for an already successful fashion/beauty photographer while gaining studio experience, (which incidentally is how I came across your website, and I admire your work!). Look forward to your reply, thanks

Since I value your opinion, I’d appreciate it if you could tell me if you have any personal experience working with or using any Russian lenses based on Zeiss designs such as the the Helios 40-2 85mm f1.5 (known for its bokeh)…or if you’re familiar with others like the KMZ Tair-11A with its aperture blades just to name a couple. I know that the Helios I’ll probably use sparingly as a unique effect if I go ahead and get it, but in terms of the others and Soviet era lenses in general, what are your thoughts?