<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DACE: Canon 5D2 and Panasonic GH1, Studio Beauty clips</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mikekobal.com/742/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mikekobal.com/742/</link>
	<description>PHOTOGRAPHY</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 May 2017 00:27:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike.kobal</title>
		<link>http://www.mikekobal.com/742/comment-page-1/#comment-5276</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mike.kobal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 19:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikekobal.com/?p=742#comment-5276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Her name is Dace (google Dace model)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Her name is Dace (google Dace model)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dex</title>
		<link>http://www.mikekobal.com/742/comment-page-1/#comment-5275</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 19:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikekobal.com/?p=742#comment-5275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who is the model ?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who is the model ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike.kobal</title>
		<link>http://www.mikekobal.com/742/comment-page-1/#comment-4728</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mike.kobal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 02:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikekobal.com/?p=742#comment-4728</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[depends what you are looking for. speed, higher frame rate, more dof, the gh1 wins (at 720p) you can get nice slomo. but for everything else, esp low light, shallow depth of field, better codec, the 5d wins]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>depends what you are looking for. speed, higher frame rate, more dof, the gh1 wins (at 720p) you can get nice slomo. but for everything else, esp low light, shallow depth of field, better codec, the 5d wins</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike.kobal</title>
		<link>http://www.mikekobal.com/742/comment-page-1/#comment-4727</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mike.kobal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 02:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikekobal.com/?p=742#comment-4727</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[in this particular shoot, it would be hard to tell the difference]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in this particular shoot, it would be hard to tell the difference</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oleg Kalyan</title>
		<link>http://www.mikekobal.com/742/comment-page-1/#comment-4720</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oleg Kalyan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 13:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikekobal.com/?p=742#comment-4720</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[how does GH1 compare to 5dmk2 in your opinion, Mike?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how does GH1 compare to 5dmk2 in your opinion, Mike?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oleg Kalyan</title>
		<link>http://www.mikekobal.com/742/comment-page-1/#comment-4719</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oleg Kalyan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 13:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikekobal.com/?p=742#comment-4719</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi, Mike, can you tell how clips from GH1 and 5dmk2 compare?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Mike, can you tell how clips from GH1 and 5dmk2 compare?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike.kobal</title>
		<link>http://www.mikekobal.com/742/comment-page-1/#comment-4711</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mike.kobal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 03:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikekobal.com/?p=742#comment-4711</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[thanks Pedro, in this case I selected the higher frame rate, will have to wait and see if mixing footage will cause problems, but none so far]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks Pedro, in this case I selected the higher frame rate, will have to wait and see if mixing footage will cause problems, but none so far</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike.kobal</title>
		<link>http://www.mikekobal.com/742/comment-page-1/#comment-4710</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mike.kobal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 03:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikekobal.com/?p=742#comment-4710</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[thanks Stefan, yes, teh 76-150mm is great wide open, i put a wide rubber band on the zoom/focusing ring, it is very loose.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks Stefan, yes, teh 76-150mm is great wide open, i put a wide rubber band on the zoom/focusing ring, it is very loose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefan</title>
		<link>http://www.mikekobal.com/742/comment-page-1/#comment-4709</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stefan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 22:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikekobal.com/?p=742#comment-4709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sexy video :)
Is the 75-150mm really that good? I heard some issues about a loose focus ring or something. Oh and by the way whats the best aperture? (I&#039;m considering to buy it.. but only if it really is good at apertures between 3.5-5.6)
And yeah adobe premiere pro cs5 really is good.
Guess BBC figured that out as well: http://www.adobe.com/aboutadobe/pressroom/pressreleases/201009/090910BBCAdoptsPremiereProCS5.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sexy video <img src="http://www.mikekobal.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" class="wp-smiley" /><br />
Is the 75-150mm really that good? I heard some issues about a loose focus ring or something. Oh and by the way whats the best aperture? (I&#8217;m considering to buy it.. but only if it really is good at apertures between 3.5-5.6)<br />
And yeah adobe premiere pro cs5 really is good.<br />
Guess BBC figured that out as well: <a href="http://www.adobe.com/aboutadobe/pressroom/pressreleases/201009/090910BBCAdoptsPremiereProCS5.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.adobe.com/aboutadobe/pressroom/pressreleases/201009/090910BBCAdoptsPremiereProCS5.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pedro Lemos</title>
		<link>http://www.mikekobal.com/742/comment-page-1/#comment-4708</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pedro Lemos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 21:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikekobal.com/?p=742#comment-4708</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi, Mike.
Nice video, as usual.
i&#039;m a fan of this blog.
That&#039;s very interesting, mixing different footage, with no transcoding.
How do you deal with different frame rates?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Mike.<br />
Nice video, as usual.<br />
i&#8217;m a fan of this blog.<br />
That&#8217;s very interesting, mixing different footage, with no transcoding.<br />
How do you deal with different frame rates?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
